Many people struggle to invest for the future. Few people feel like they are financially prepared for retirement. One of the most critical aspects of financial planning is developing an investment plan. Fortress Investment Group is a company that has provided quality investment advice to clients for several decades. The company takes a unique approach to investing. Instead of offering a standard portfolio allocation, Fortress Investment Group tells clients to focus on alternative investment solutions as well. Some of these assets are in things like gold or real estate. Others are in riskier asset classes like cryptocurrency.
Starting the Company
Fortress Investment Group was started several years ago. At the time, the founders wanted to start a company that offered investment advice for average person. Multiple investment banks only want to deal with customers who earn a certain income. When working with Fortress Investment Group, every customer will feel like they are essential to the company.When Fortress Investment Group was started, few people thought that the company would become successful. However, the company provided superior investment returns and many clients joined the bank.
Interest rates are a crucial aspect of the economy. Interest rates have been rising for several years. Investment managers need to understand how to utilize different strategies in an economy where rates are increasing. Higher interest rates benefit some people while hurting others. For example, people who plan to borrow money in the coming years will end up paying more for lending products.Higher interest rates could also impact the housing market. In some cities, there is already a massive shortage of homes. Higher rates mean that housing is even less affordable than it already is. Fortress Investment Group believes that investors can take advantage of higher rates by following the investment strategies outlined by the company.
Shervin Pishevar identifies Facebook as one of the 5 monopolies stifling economic growth. All are US companies. America has been considered the land of opportunity. Unfortunately, the world changed to where a few corporations exert significant control over its resources. Opportunities still exist, but global monopolies threaten the future of opportunity. Shervin Pishevar recognizes this.
Facebook is a true behemoth. Only such a large corporation could have crossed privacy lines with such magnitude as to echo throughout the world. Both the US and Europe are examining Facebook’s handling of private information.
The influence of monopolies extend beyond their business operations. This a primary reason why they have, at least, a certain amount of social responsibility. Facebook’s lackadaisical attitude toward sharing private information is more significant than most people consider. If not properly dealt with, it could set a precedent that finds Twitter and other social media platforms dismissing the rights of individuals who trust their information to these entities.
Since these social media giants influence global culture, privacy infringement could spread quickly. It is unknown what the lack of privacy and ownership of personal information would mean for the world, but there is a historical context to draw from. The United States Constitution acknowledges how important privacy is to a free economy. The nation grew strong, in part, because of this liberty. If the right to privacy and private property were suddenly revoked, there would be an uproar on a global scale.
The abysmal handling of private information by Facebook did not reach the level that Shervin Pishevar warns of. At least not yet. Social media is a global phenomenon. Its impact on modern culture is as integral as any pattern of behavior in existence today. Monopolistic influence on social media is a very important issue, even when privacy is protected. Similar to advertising on television, it has the potential to shape the thoughts of the masses. Social media platforms are supposed to empower individuals who have experiences to share. However, as Shervin Pishevar points out, a few in charge of this system can contradict the original intent.